
Eusebius of Emesa in one of his discourses has quite a long passage about allegorizing. He allows that it cannot altogether be rejected but he is very cautious about its use. It tends to read meanings into the text which are good in themselves but are simply not present in the text. It can be an illegitimate short cut. A man who is bound or who is in prison is anxious to be free by any means, but not all means are right. Had all ancient interpreters of the Bible followed this advice, subsequent generations would have been saved the necessity of reading a great deal of nonsense. (The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God, p. 829, emphases added)
The history of hermeneutics alone demonstrates that this is not the best possible world. π
Related posts:

feedback on an argument that the New Testament is unitarian

How Trinity theories conflict with the New Testament

podcast 115 - the aborted council at Serdica in 343

Patton's problem with Apologists

Flocanrib - a parable

podcast 197 β Noah Worcester on Atonement β Part 2

podcast 402 β Craig is right about eternal generation, BUT . . .

a mini-course on atonement by Dr. Josh Thurow

Dealing with Apparent Contradictions: Part 5 - Aquinas on Implicit Faith (Dale)

