podcast 234 – Dr. James R. Gordon on the extra Calvinisticum – Part 2
Is the “extra Calvinisticum” both biblical and theologically helpful?
Is the “extra Calvinisticum” both biblical and theologically helpful?
Would a God who is a single Person fail to be perfect?
When a NT author claims that Jesus fulfills an OT text which is about God, is that his way of saying that Jesus is God?
A conversation about the New Testament on God, Jesus, and worship.
Is the New Testament position that Christians should only worship God himself?
Did you know that “Trinity” has long been an ambiguous term?
Rebutting a slanderous and careless “review” by a blogger.
Does the gospel of Mark hint that Jesus is Yahweh in the flesh?
If only trinitarian scholars majored in consistent, intelligible, fully informed answers!
“Of myself, I can do nothing.” Is this claim about Jesus’s self/person, or only about his “human nature”?
How could God allow the church to err on something so important?
Is reforming in light of scripture only acceptable in the distant past?
Can a unitarian Christian explain why God has the capacity for interpersonal love?
Apologist explains what any theist can, declares victory for his own pet theory.
Real arguments vs. pointed questions combined with incredulous tone.
Do we need reconciliation to God, while he doesn’t need reconciliation to us?
Steve Hays has posted on my critiques of purely philosophical arguments from theism to the Trinity.