Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Spotify | Email | RSS
In this special episode Dr. Ryan Mullins makes a case that God should be understood as “in” time, and not as timeless, as asserted by traditional catholic theologians (“classical theists”).
In classic Protestant fashion, he argues from scripture and reason against certain longstanding theological and philosophical traditions.
Are you convinced? Why or why not?
[spp-tweet tweet=”Is God in time, yet not a “prisoner” of time?”]
This is the second talk in our special series from the 2017 workshop on God and time in Bonn, Germany.
Links for this episode:
- Dr. Ryan Mullins
- What is God’s relationship to time?
- the Society for the Philosophy of Time (a.k.a. SPoT)
- “Cambridge” changes
- God and Time
- Pierre Gassendi
- Anglican Archbishop John Tillotson
- Psalm 90:2; Hosea 11:8-9; Numbers 23:19
- This week’s thinking music is “Monarch of the Street” by Loyalty Freak Music.
Related posts:
the Maverick Philosopher on some fashionable confusions
On a Rebuttal to my “How Trinity theories conflict with the New Testament” - Part 2
Congrats on a Publication
podcast 154 - Mormons seeing the man behind the curtain - Part 2
Worship and Revelation 4-5 - Part 2 - Revelation 4
the Quaternity Argument
podcast 106 - Dr. James Spiegel on unbelief and belief in the Bible
New Papers
podcast 271 - Does your Trinity theory require relative identity?
