Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Spotify | Email | RSS
In this special episode Dr. Ryan Mullins makes a case that God should be understood as “in” time, and not as timeless, as asserted by traditional catholic theologians (“classical theists”).
In classic Protestant fashion, he argues from scripture and reason against certain longstanding theological and philosophical traditions.
Are you convinced? Why or why not?
This is the second talk in our special series from the 2017 workshop on God and time in Bonn, Germany.
Links for this episode:
- Dr. Ryan Mullins
- What is God’s relationship to time?
- the Society for the Philosophy of Time (a.k.a. SPoT)
- “Cambridge” changes
- God and Time
- Pierre Gassendi
- Anglican Archbishop John Tillotson
- Psalm 90:2; Hosea 11:8-9; Numbers 23:19
- This week’s thinking music is “Monarch of the Street” by Loyalty Freak Music.
Related posts:
podcast 214 - Has Bauckham clarified his "divine identity" theory? - Part 2
"paterderivationism," monotheism, and "mono-theos-ism"
podcast 289 – “Socinian” approaches to John 1 – Part 2
Reference and Identity in Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Scriptures: The Same God?
podcast 27 - Interview with Dr. William Hasker about his Metaphysics and the Tripersonal God - Part ...
some clarifications: a reply to McManus - part 2
Dealing with Apparent Contradictions: Part 19 - Review of Antognazza on Leibniz
Jesus and “god” - part 11 - Review and Conclusion
podcast 245 – Response to Branson Part 3 – Dueling Definitions
podcast 194 - God: One Person or Three? Sanders vs. Buzzard debate