Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Spotify | Email | RSS
In this episode: mutual interrogations, closing statements, and audience questions and answers.
- Which side put forward the stronger opening case?
- Which did a better job in rebuttal?
- What if anything was revealed by the mutual interrogations?
- What if anything was added by the brief closing statements?
- And which answers to audience questions did you think were important, and why?
You be the judge.
In the next episode I’ll share some of my thoughts about this debate.
Thanks to James White and to the co-sponsors of the debate: First Lutheran Houston and the Unitarian Christian Alliance.
Links for this episode:
podcast 377 – Debate: Is Jesus Yahweh? White vs. Tuggy – Part 1
Restitutio 539 Dale Tuggy’s Thoughts on the James White Debate: Is Jesus Yahweh?
the fully produced UCA version of the debate video
Restitutio 450 Seven Interpretive Options for Hebrews 1.10-12 (Jerry Wierwille)
This week’s thinking music is “Badoobap” by Van Loon.
Related posts:
Tom Belt on the Trinity
Dialogue with the Maverick Philosopher: God is a being, not Being itself – part 3
One-self Trinity theories
Meeting Rush
Dealing with Apparent Contradictions: Part 2 - Redirection (Dale)
losing patience with the hint-hunters
podcast 107 - Dr. Robert M. Bowman Jr. on triadic New Testament passages - part 1
Buzzard's textual arguments against Jesus' pre-human existence - Part 3
Flocanrib explained - Irene's mistake
podcast 36 – Interview with Dr. Bart Ehrman about his How Jesus Became God - Part 2