Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Spotify | Email | RSS
In this episode: mutual interrogations, closing statements, and audience questions and answers.
- Which side put forward the stronger opening case?
- Which did a better job in rebuttal?
- What if anything was revealed by the mutual interrogations?
- What if anything was added by the brief closing statements?
- And which answers to audience questions did you think were important, and why?
You be the judge.
In the next episode I’ll share some of my thoughts about this debate.
Thanks to James White and to the co-sponsors of the debate: First Lutheran Houston and the Unitarian Christian Alliance.
Links for this episode:
podcast 377 – Debate: Is Jesus Yahweh? White vs. Tuggy – Part 1
Restitutio 539 Dale Tuggy’s Thoughts on the James White Debate: Is Jesus Yahweh?
the fully produced UCA version of the debate video
Restitutio 450 Seven Interpretive Options for Hebrews 1.10-12 (Jerry Wierwille)
Related posts:
podcast 149 - Dr. Larry Hurtado's Destroyer of the gods - Part 1
SCORING THE BURKE – BOWMAN DEBATE – Burke 1
Catholic Theologian Hans Küng on New Testament theology
Hays denies that Jesus died
"Sabellianism Reconsidered" Considered - Part 1
podcast 27 - Interview with Dr. William Hasker about his Metaphysics and the Tripersonal God - Part ...
Caught between catholic tradition and the Bible
podcast 202 - Gregory of Nazianzus vs. Noah Worcester on subordinationist texts
the evolution of my views on the Trinity - part 8
podcast 223 – Self-evident truths relevant to Trinity or Incarnation theories – Part 2