Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Spotify | Email | RSS

In this episode: mutual interrogations, closing statements, and audience questions and answers.
- Which side put forward the stronger opening case?
- Which did a better job in rebuttal?
- What if anything was revealed by the mutual interrogations?
- What if anything was added by the brief closing statements?
- And which answers to audience questions did you think were important, and why?
You be the judge.
In the next episode I’ll share some of my thoughts about this debate.
Thanks to James White and to the co-sponsors of the debate: First Lutheran Houston and the Unitarian Christian Alliance.
Links for this episode:
podcast 377 – Debate: Is Jesus Yahweh? White vs. Tuggy – Part 1
Restitutio 539 Dale Tuggy’s Thoughts on the James White Debate: Is Jesus Yahweh?
the fully produced UCA version of the debate video
Restitutio 450 Seven Interpretive Options for Hebrews 1.10-12 (Jerry Wierwille)
Related posts:

Welcome to Dividing Line / James White fans

a new proof of God's existence, with an assist from Dr. Bart Ehrman?

podcast 396 - Debate: Tuggy vs. White - John 1 is not Trinitarian - Part 3

The Standard Opening Move

Did Jesus have faith in God? – Part 3

on interpersonal love and stick figures (Dale)

podcast 392 - Jesus' Temptations and Ours - Part 2 - Things Apologists Say

podcast 91 - Dr. Joshua Thurow on theories of the atonement

podcast 391 - Jesus' Temptations and Ours - Part 1 - Luke 4

