Eusebius of Emesa in one of his discourses has quite a long passage about allegorizing. He allows that it cannot altogether be rejected but he is very cautious about its use. It tends to read meanings into the text which are good in themselves but are simply not present in the text. It can be an illegitimate short cut. A man who is bound or who is in prison is anxious to be free by any means, but not all means are right. Had all ancient interpreters of the Bible followed this advice, subsequent generations would have been saved the necessity of reading a great deal of nonsense. (The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God, p. 829, emphases added)
The history of hermeneutics alone demonstrates that this is not the best possible world. 🙂
Related posts:
Deviant Calvinism roundup 1 - Crisp on Crisp
Linkage: Dialogue at Triablogue
podcast 109 - Dr. Keith Ward on Christ and the Cosmos - Part 1
The Lost Early History of Unitarian Christian Theology
Philip Jenkins on Philo's theology
10 Practical Tips for becoming a Worse Apologist
The Standard Opening Move
Is Allah God? Goofus and Gallant, Grok and Sophie
Linkage: Scott Williams's Henry of Ghent blog (Dale)
podcast 283 – Does the Bible Teach that God is a Trinity? Cole-Tuggy Dialogue – Part 2