A trinitarian facepalm for this, from a Bob Jones University Press grade school textbook (HT: Digg.)
Not having seen the book, I can’t be sure what is going on here. Here are some options:
- The writer is terribly uninformed.
- The writer is feigning ignorance in a misguided attempt to instill delight and wonder into science.
- The writers is feigning ignorance in an attempt to multiply “mysteries”. If there are a lot of “mysteries” (realities we don’t understand) in nature, then any theological mysteries will be unproblematic. Call this “innocence by association” apologetics.
- The writer is ham-handedly trying to make a (controversial) Kantian point about science – that it only reveals how things appear and not how they really are.
I’d like to believe that 1 is unlikely. It could be that all of 2-4 are going on here. Either way, this is clearly educational malpractice, especially the “All anyone knows is that…” part.
Anyone out there have the actual book?
Related posts:
banning the word "trinitarian"
Dealing with Apparent Contradictions: Part 18 - Mysteries and the Bible (Dale)
Reformed trinitarian to unitarian Christian
Dealing with Apparent Contradictions: Part 14 - James Anderson's Paradox in Christian Theology
Feser's Negative Mysterian Defense of the Trinity
podcast 375 - The Trinity, the Deity of Christ, and the Best Craig - Part 1
apologist commits to actual Trinity theory, faceplants - Part 2
Origen on the Challenge to Jesus is God Apologists
podcast 129 – Ehrman and Bird on How Jesus Became God – Part 2
the evolution of my views on the Trinity - part 7
Oh dear.
Comments are closed.