A trinitarian facepalm for this, from a Bob Jones University Press grade school textbook (HT: Digg.)
Not having seen the book, I can’t be sure what is going on here. Here are some options:
- The writer is terribly uninformed.
- The writer is feigning ignorance in a misguided attempt to instill delight and wonder into science.
- The writers is feigning ignorance in an attempt to multiply “mysteries”. If there are a lot of “mysteries” (realities we don’t understand) in nature, then any theological mysteries will be unproblematic. Call this “innocence by association” apologetics.
- The writer is ham-handedly trying to make a (controversial) Kantian point about science – that it only reveals how things appear and not how they really are.
I’d like to believe that 1 is unlikely. It could be that all of 2-4 are going on here. Either way, this is clearly educational malpractice, especially the “All anyone knows is that…” part.
Anyone out there have the actual book?
Related posts:

podcast 352 - Kegan Chandler - Jesus' Messianic Self-Awareness and "Early High Christology"

Randal Rauser on "You Sophist!"

10 steps towards getting less confused about the Trinity – #3 Take the mystery out of appeals to "my...

Dealing with Apparent Contradictions: Part 2 - Redirection (Dale)

No Trinity, No Job – Part 2

podcast 317 - Debate with Rogers - Does Mark teach that Jesus is God? - Part 1

Quote: Stephen Nye on disliking the clear as such (Dale)

The Standard Opening Move

Marcus Borg's atheism


Oh dear.
Comments are closed.