Help for James White on Identity
Sincere advice on how to move past a merely verbal defense of “the Trinity.”
Calvinism
podcast 361 – A Lutheran pastor explains Socinianism and biblical unitarianism
Is it the foundational commitment of biblical unitarians that Scripture must be inoffensive to human reason?
podcast 313 – Weighing Channing Unitarianism
Which parts of Channing’s thought do and don’t hold up today?
podcast 310 – Channing’s “Objections to Unitarian Christianity Considered”
Does unitarian Christianity “deny the Divinity of Christ,” preach “morality,” and teach salvation by works?
podcast 308 – Channing’s “Unitarian Christianity” – Part 1
A famous manifesto of unitarian Christianity from 1819
podcast 276 – How is the Trinity Central to the Gospel? Or: How The Gospel Coalition Prioritizes Speculation over Scripture
Who needs the Bible when you can gesture at some philosophical speculations?
podcast 234 – Dr. James R. Gordon on the extra Calvinisticum – Part 2
Is the “extra Calvinisticum” both biblical and theologically helpful?
podcast 233 – Dr. James R. Gordon on the extra Calvinisticum – Part 1
The “extra Calvinisticum” and the coherence of Chalcedonian christology.
podcast 217 – Bignon’s Defense of Calvinism – Part 2
Does Calvinism make God the “author of evil”? Dr. Bignon argues that this charge will not stick.
podcast 196 – Noah Worcester on Atonement – Part 1
Did God punish Jesus on the cross with the punishment due us all?
podcast 182 – White’s case for the Trinity – Part 2
Dr. White vs. John on the thesis of the 4th gospel.
Hays denies that Jesus died
The gospel commits us to more than: “Jesus died” is (somehow or other) true.
Hays on “God” in the New Testament
One’s theology can lead one to deny obvious facts about the New Testament.
podcast 181 – White’s case for the Trinity – Part 1
Is this a powerful, state-of-the-art biblical argument for the Trinity?
podcast 168 – The Death of Unitarian Congregationalism
How and why did American Unitarian Congregationalism die?
podcast 163 – Dr. K. Scott Oliphint on How Christianity Trumps Philosophy
Does Christianity trump Philosophy?
Are atheists denying the obvious? Koukl vs. Rauser and Feser
Here’s an overview, with a few comments, of an interesting little public disagreement about Romans 1 and atheism. The discussion was kicked off by evangelical apologist Greg Koukl’s “No Duh” video, where he says that according to Romans 1, all atheists are intentionally suppressing their knowledge of God. Randal Rauser then pointed out a hard to accept implication of Koukl’s claim, which seems to require us to re-think just how… Read More »Are atheists denying the obvious? Koukl vs. Rauser and Feser