Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Spotify | Email | RSS
Dr. James R. Gordon’s The Holy One in Our Midst defends the doctrine which has been called the extra Calvinisticum.
Modern theologians have objected that the extra implies an incomplete Incarnation, “Nestorian” heresy, and that only the Word but not the “human nature” of Christ should be worshiped.
In this second part of our conversation (Part 1 here), Dr. Gordon rebuts these charges, and argues that this doctrine is in a sense biblical, and that it is theologically useful.
Do you agree? Why or why not?
Links for this episode:
- Dr. Gordon’s home page
- The Holy One in Our Midst: An Essay on the Flesh of Christ
- Wheaton College Philosophy Department
- podcast 144 – Dr. Timothy Pawl’s In Defense of Conciliar Christology – Part 2
- podcast 143 – Dr. Timothy Pawl’s In Defense of Conciliar Christology – Part 1
- podcast 112 – Dr. Joseph Jedwab on divine omnipresence – Part 2
- podcast 111 – Dr. Joseph Jedwab on divine omnipresence – Part 1
- Clarifying Catholic Christologies
- This week’s thinking music is “The Ants Built A City On His Chest” by Doctor Turtle.
Related posts:
what "pants" teaches us about "elohim" ("God")
podcast 101 - Dr. Brian Leftow: from Jerusalem to Athens
Keith Ward Trinity symposium in Philosophia Christi
Linkage: Mavericking Mysteries
Dealing with Apparent Contradictions: Part 4 - Restraint and Implicit Faith
podcast 205 – Conversation with a frustrated trinitarian – Part 2
Why you can ignore "Sharp's Rule"
podcast 44 - The Spiritual Journey of Sir Anthony Buzzard
"No one is good except God alone."
"the" Trinity doctrine - Part 3
Dale – Thanks for these efforts.
Greg
Comments are closed.