Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Spotify | Email | RSS
Dr. James R. Gordon’s The Holy One in Our Midst defends the doctrine which has been called the extra Calvinisticum.
Modern theologians have objected that the extra implies an incomplete Incarnation, “Nestorian” heresy, and that only the Word but not the “human nature” of Christ should be worshiped.
In this second part of our conversation (Part 1 here), Dr. Gordon rebuts these charges, and argues that this doctrine is in a sense biblical, and that it is theologically useful.
Do you agree? Why or why not?
Links for this episode:
- Dr. Gordon’s home page
- The Holy One in Our Midst: An Essay on the Flesh of Christ
- Wheaton College Philosophy Department
- podcast 144 – Dr. Timothy Pawl’s In Defense of Conciliar Christology – Part 2
- podcast 143 – Dr. Timothy Pawl’s In Defense of Conciliar Christology – Part 1
- podcast 112 – Dr. Joseph Jedwab on divine omnipresence – Part 2
- podcast 111 – Dr. Joseph Jedwab on divine omnipresence – Part 1
- Clarifying Catholic Christologies
- This week’s thinking music is “The Ants Built A City On His Chest” by Doctor Turtle.
Related posts:
podcast 370 - Dr. Steven Nemes's formal challenge to Trinity theories
Dialogue with the Maverick Philosopher: God is a being, not Being itself – part 5
apologist commits to actual Trinity theory, faceplants - Part 1
Rauser's review of What is the Trinity?
podcast 159 - Aaron Arinder on Ontological Pluralism and the Trinity
podcast 56 - Richard Swinburne on his life and work
a reading of Philippians 2:5-11
Smith on Rea and Murray on philosophical theology
MMM unleashed @ trinities
the evolution of my views on the Trinity - part 8
Dale – Thanks for these efforts.
Greg
Comments are closed.