…I will not deny clear things concerning the Trinity, as some do, only because they are clear. I don’t think we may argue after this manner; “The Doctrine of the Trinity is a Mystery; your Account of it is no Mystery, therefore it is not the true Doctrine of the Trinity”: For it will be still mysterious enough to us, tho we do not reject what is clear, or certain, about it.
-Stephen Nye, Institutions, Corcerning the Holy Trinity, And the Manner of our Saviour’s Divinity, London, 1703, p. 114
Related posts:
Richard of St. Victor’s De Trinitate, Ch. 24 (Dale)
Randal Rauser Roundly Rips "Rahner's Rule." Result? R.I.P. Really.
SCORING THE BURKE – BOWMAN DEBATE – Bowman 3
Deviant Calvinism roundup 1 - Crisp on Crisp
Orthodox modalism
the Bible teaches that David is God
Dallas Willard: God is Happy
trinitarian or unitarian? 6 – Origen's Against Celsus - Part 2
SCORING THE BURKE – BOWMAN DEBATE – ROUND 5 – BOWMAN – PART 3
Trinitarian-Unitarian Debates - 1 Bosserman vs. Finnegan, 2008 - Part 1