…I will not deny clear things concerning the Trinity, as some do, only because they are clear. I don’t think we may argue after this manner; “The Doctrine of the Trinity is a Mystery; your Account of it is no Mystery, therefore it is not the true Doctrine of the Trinity”: For it will be still mysterious enough to us, tho we do not reject what is clear, or certain, about it.
-Stephen Nye, Institutions, Corcerning the Holy Trinity, And the Manner of our Saviour’s Divinity, London, 1703, p. 114
Related posts:
SCORING THE BURKE – BOWMAN DEBATE – Bowman 2
podcast 19 - Lewis vs. Rogers 3 - second rebuttals and closing statements
Mysterians at work in Dallas
Islam-Inspired Modalism - Part 3
Frost on Trinity and Scripture
Trinitarian-Unitarian Debates - 1 Bosserman vs. Finnegan, 2008 - Part 1
SCORING THE BURKE – BOWMAN DEBATE – Burke 3
Need More Rs
White vs. Navas - Does the New Testament teach "the deity of Christ"?
Mark Edwards on Councils and the Trinity