
Over at the Maverick Philosopher, Bill Vallicella and some others have been on a tear of philosophical theology, specifically on appeal to mysteries in theology, and on incarnation issues.
Here, atheist philosopher Peter Lupu mounts an argument against positive mysteriansism.
Bill asks: Does inconceivability entail impossibility. (No.) And: Whether Jesus exists necessarily? (No.)
In another post, Bill argues that if a mysterian defense works for belief in the Trinity, it should work for materialists about human beings too.
And here, Bill explains very clearly why the distinction between primary substance and supposit is open to the charge of being ad hoc.
The comments are of very high quality. My only objection is that when I’m busy, it’s hard to keep up with this philosophical hot rod!
Related posts:

John A. T. Robinson on "the Word" of John 1

podcast 49 – 2 interpretations of Philippians 2 – part 2

Counting Wives - a tale of three polygamists - Part 2

podcast 238 - Dialogue with a Catholic Listener

Moses Stuart on Nicea

podcast 284 – Does the Bible Teach that God is a Trinity? Cole-Tuggy Dialogue – Part 3

podcast 87 - Kermit Zarley on the deity and preexistence of Jesus

apologist commits to actual Trinity theory, faceplants - Part 1

Islam-Inspired Modalism - Part 2

