
My “On Positive Mysterianism” has been published in the International Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
My thanks to theologian James Anderson (blog) for significant correspondence – he’s intellectually honest, smart, tough-minded, and humble – a pleasure to argue with. Thanks also to my colleagues for enduring multiple drafts and re-writes.
In this paper, my main task is evaluating the mysterianism of James’s book. My view may be more nuanced that some would guess, based on my earlier work. I concede that in principle it can be reasonable to believe an apparent contradiction. I’m not optimistic about the actual prospects of having such beliefs, though.
It seems that James and I mostly disagree about the Bible, not about epistemology – he strongly endorsing, and me eschewing apparently contradictory interpretations of it regarding God and Christ.
The paper, especially the first part, has a lot to do with this long series here at trinities, though it is more focused.
Related posts:

podcast 369 - Anna Shoffner Brown - Nothing 'Mere' about a Man in the Image of God

Scott Williams's new paper: Henry of Ghent on Real Relations and the Trinity

10 steps towards getting less confused about the Trinity - #9 - Formulas vs. Interpretations

Bring it on: How ___ became ___

Richard of St. Victor’s De Trinitate, Ch. 22 - part 1

publications update

podcast 302 - The Stages of Trinitarian Commitment

trinitarian or unitarian? 7 – Origen uncensored

"the only true President" of the USA, another laughable Fox News blunder


Pingback: trinities - Need More Rs (Dale)
Comments are closed.