
My “On Positive Mysterianism” has been published in the International Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
My thanks to theologian James Anderson (blog) for significant correspondence – he’s intellectually honest, smart, tough-minded, and humble – a pleasure to argue with. Thanks also to my colleagues for enduring multiple drafts and re-writes.
In this paper, my main task is evaluating the mysterianism of James’s book. My view may be more nuanced that some would guess, based on my earlier work. I concede that in principle it can be reasonable to believe an apparent contradiction. I’m not optimistic about the actual prospects of having such beliefs, though.
It seems that James and I mostly disagree about the Bible, not about epistemology – he strongly endorsing, and me eschewing apparently contradictory interpretations of it regarding God and Christ.
The paper, especially the first part, has a lot to do with this long series here at trinities, though it is more focused.
Related posts:

Richard of St. Victor’s De Trinitate, Ch. 24 (Dale)

Quote: Stephen Nye on disliking the clear as such (Dale)

Swinburne @ Biola

"Must-Read Paper" "On Counting Gods"

podcast 279 – Response to Burgos on Creation and the one God vs. the one Lord – Part 2

on interpersonal love and stick figures (Dale)

H.O.G. Questions

a reply to Robert Bowman on biblical monotheism, the Trinity, and the Shema

podcast 36 – Interview with Dr. Bart Ehrman about his How Jesus Became God - Part 2


Pingback: trinities - Need More Rs (Dale)
Comments are closed.