Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Spotify | Email | RSS
In this final portion of our debate, we engage in about 40 minutes of free-flowing discussion, followed by our closing statements.
Our topic is New Testament teaching, but I can’t resist raising what look to me like some serious problems for Dr. Loke’s “kryptic” theory of the incarnation, on which the Son’s divine omniscience is in his “pre-conscious” mind, not being directly accessible to him. Among other problems, surely perfection in knowledge requires more than omniscience, and some divine attributes are not mental.
Now that you’ve heard the whole debate, which side made the stronger case, and why?
After you hear our exchange on the famous “my Lord and my God” text, you can check out the video below from the Unitarian Christian Alliance YouTube channel. I think it makes points which complement my all-too-brief remarks here.
Links for this episode:
podcast 339 – Does the New Testament teach that Jesus is truly divine? – Loke vs. Tuggy – Part 1
Dr. Loke’s publications at Academia.edu
Loke, The Origin of Divine Christology
Loke, A Kryptic Model of the Incarnation
Jordan Hampton’s The Analytic Christian YouTube channel
The original video of this whole debate.
Kermit Zarley on “My Lord and my God.”
A letter from the Lord Jesus: About God and Me
Tuggy and Date, Is Jesus Human and Not Divine?
podcast 259 – Who is the one Creator? – Part 2
podcast 258 – Who is the one Creator? – Part 1
podcast 225 – Biblical Words for God and for his Son Part 2 – Old “Lord” vs. New “Lord”
podcast 224 – Biblical Words for God and for his Son Part 1 – God and “God” in the Bible
podcast 145 – ‘Tis Mystery All: the Immortal dies!
This week’s thinking music is “Saturday (Instrumental)” by Josh Woodward.
