Theology blogger / author / golf pro Kermit Zarley posts on the Holy Spirit.
A few excerpts:
During the 2nd and 3rd centuries, there was no consensus among church fathers, called “apologists,” about the constitution of the Holy Spirit. Most of them didn’t think it was important. In fact, there was a widespread fluidity of ideas among Christians about it. Some thought the Holy Spirit was an impersonal power; others ascribed full personality to the Holy Spirit.
…it should be understood from creation that the Spirit of God is to God what the spirit of man is to man. Since man’s spirit is not a person as we moderns understand personhood, God’s Spirit must not be a person either. Rather, the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of the Father (Matthew 10.20; Mark 13.11). (emphases added)
Check out the whole thing.
Related posts:

podcast 145 - 'Tis Mystery All: the Immortal dies!

7 Weird Theologians

podcast 95 - Dr. Winfried Corduan: Are all religions the same?

podcast 389 - The Cost of Truth: Stories of Biblical Unitarian Christians

Arius and Athanasius, part 1 -- How is the Son produced? (JT)

a conversation with two trinitarian apologists

Origen, Paul, and Peter: Christians worship the Jews' god

podcast 271 - Does your Trinity theory require relative identity?

podcast 309 - Channing's "Unitarian Christianity" - Part 2

