At the Journal of Analytic Philosophy, and at the Journal of Biblical Unitarianism. Thanks to the editors of both journals for their good work.
The first paper continues the discussion with Hasker of my “Divine Deception” arguments against three-self Trinity theories. I discuss there the monotheism of Isaiah. Then I get into interesting arguments by historical unitarians, such as Nye, Clarke, and Worcester, even comparing and contrasting Clarke’s Origen-like view with that of three-self (“social”) trinitarians like Hasker and Swinburne. In short, the three-selfers clash with the theology and language of the Bible. But the Bible has to win that battle.
The second concerns a vital question for all Christians: how to understand the relation of God, Jesus, and worship. If we should worship both God and Jesus, does that show that they are one and the same, the same god? Or if we know that Jesus are God are two, does that mean we should worship only God? I argue no to both, on New Testament grounds. It is a written version of this screencast lecture.
Links to both papers are on the newly updated home page, upper right.
Related posts:

podcast 202 - Gregory of Nazianzus vs. Noah Worcester on subordinationist texts

SCORING THE BURKE – BOWMAN DEBATE – ROUND 4 PART 2 - BOWMAN

Parsing Plantinga: is there such a person as God?

podcast 325 – Dr. Jc Beall – The Contradictory Christ – Part 2

podcast 379 - AI and I evaluate my debate with James White

podcast 97 - Dr. Michael Heiser on The Unseen Realm

podcast 277 - Was Christ tempted in every way?

Welcome to Dividing Line / James White fans

Tuggy vs. Date: the book is better


Pingback: Dale Tuggy’s recent trinitarian trilemma | Cognitive Resonance
Hi Dale,
I read your divine deception JAT paper today and really enjoyed it. I really enjoyed the contrast between Samuel Clarke and ST, particularly the importance of generation relations (or lack thereof). Also good to see your god/GOD defs in action. All the best,
Comments are closed.